Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 11:44

Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How Moderna Went From Pandemic Hero to Vaccine Victim - WSJ
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Texas woman dies from brain-eating amoeba after using tap water for nasal rinse - Scripps News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
'The Walking Dead: Dead City' finale ending with Negan and Maggie explained - Entertainment Weekly
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Nvidia, Other Chip Stocks Slide Amid Worries About US-China Trade Tensions - Investopedia
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Do other British people agree that the UK should reconquer Ireland?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.